A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance

Frank G.A. De Bakker*, Peter Groenewegen, Frank Den Hond

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

609 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view is that development occurred from conceptual vagueness, through clarification of central constructs and their relationships, to the testing of theory - a process supported by increased sophistication in research methods. In contrast, other authors claim that hardly any progress is to be expected because of the inherently normative character of the literature. A final view is that progress in the literature on the social responsibilities of business is obscured or even hampered by the continuing introduction of new constructs. This article explores which of these three views better describes the evolution of the literature during a period of 30 years and suggests implications for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalBusiness and Society
Volume44
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)283-317
Number of pages35
ISSN0007-6503
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2005
Externally publishedYes
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • Bibliometry
  • Corporate social performance
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Theory development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this