Projects per year
This Article critically examines the analogies scholars use to explain the special relation between the author and her work that copyright law protects under the doctrine of moral rights. The goal of this Article is to determine “when to drop the analogy and get on with developing the” content of the relation between the author and the work.” Upon examination, that moment approaches rather quickly: none of these analogies provide any helpful framework for understanding the purported relation. At worst, they are misleading rhetorical devices used to gain support for moral rights. At best, these analogies are first attempts at describing the relation between author and her work. So I assume that analogies are valuable as starting points for thinking about the relation between the author and her work, rather than explaining the nature of the relation. Even when viewed this way, however, the analogies raise more questions than they purport to answer. Because the analogies discussed do not explain the author-work relation, scholars must look elsewhere for arguments to support moral rights.
|Non-refereed scientific journal||Yale Journal of Law & Technology|
|Publication status||Published - 2019|
|MoE publication type||A1 Journal article - refereed|
- 513 Law
Areas of Strength and Areas of High Potential (AoS and AoHP)
- AoHP: Digitisation and sustainability in intellectual property
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Analogies in IP: Moral Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Active
01.07.2018 → 31.12.2022
Project: Externally funded project