Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences

Tamanna Adhikari, Michael Breen*, Robert Gillanders

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We find that new states are perceived to be more corrupt even though businesses do not report more bribery in newer states. This is suggestive of an unearned, and likely high, reputational cost to being a new state. These findings hold over a number of specifications that include additional economic, historical and geographic controls.

Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalApplied Economics Letters
Volume26
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)131-134
Number of pages4
ISSN1350-4851
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22.02.2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 511 Economics
  • Corruption
  • corruption perceptions
  • bribery
  • state age

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this