Abstract
Is complex, ambiguous, and fluctuating social reality measurable? Sometimes yes, perhaps, but often not. At least not in the fairly straightforward way assumed by many researchers. This study is an ethnographic inquiry into data collection during a survey research project. Based on our observations of participants’ spontaneous thoughts and confusions as they filled in questionnaires on “leadership” and “teamwork”, we draw attention to hidden problems in much organizational research. Many respondents found measures ambiguous, irrelevant, or misleading. We (a) underline the inherently interpretative nature of research into complex organizational phenomena, (b) warn against lack of reflexivity and overreliance on existing survey instruments when we study complex social aspects of organizations, (c) identify five categories of possible problems, and (d) suggest paths towards better informed research that take context seriously.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Management Inquiry |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 102-114 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 1056-4926 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18.07.2020 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- survey studies
- questionnaires
- critical study
- quality of research
- qualitative study
- quantitative study
- leadership
- teams
- research methods
- ethnography
Areas of Strength and Areas of High Potential (AoS and AoHP)
- AoS: Leading for growth and well-being
- AoS: Responsible organising