Comparative analysis of treatment costs in EuroHOPE

Tor Iversen, Eline Aas, Gunnar Rosenqvist, Unto Häkkinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the challenges of estimating risk-adjusted treatment costs in international comparative research, specifically in the EuroHOPE (European Health Care Outcomes, Performance, and Efficiency) project. We describe the diverse format of resource data and challenges of converting these data into resource use indicators that allow meaningful cross-country comparisons. The three cost indicators developed in EuroHOPE are then described, discussed and applied. We compare the risk-adjusted mean treatment costs of acute myocardial infarction for four of the seven countries in the EuroHOPE project, namely Finland, Hungary, Norway, and Sweden. The outcome of the comparison depends on the time perspective as well as on the particular resource use indicator. We argue that these complementary indicators add to our understanding of the variation in resource use across countries.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalHealth Economics
Volume24
Issue numberSuppl. 2
Pages (from-to)5-22
ISSN1057-9230
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 512 Business and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of treatment costs in EuroHOPE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this