Ethics, politics and embodied imagination in crafting scientific knowledge

Emma Bell*, Hugh Willmott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores ‘research-as-craft’ as a sensitizing concept for disclosing the presence of ethics and politics, as well as embodiment and imagination, in the doing and representation of scientific activity. Routinely unnoticed, marginalized or suppressed in methodology sections of articles and methodology textbooks, research-as-craft gestures towards messy, tacit, uncertain, yet rarely thematized, practices that are central to getting science done. To acknowledge and address the significance of research-as-craft in knowledge production, we show how it relates to three forms of reflexivity – constitutive, epistemic and disruptive. Through this we demonstrate the craftiness that is required when struggling with the indeterminacy that is endemic to the production and communication of scientific knowledge. By showing how empirical situations require imaginative interpretation by embodied researchers, we argue that our conception of research-as-craft facilitates appreciation of scientific inquiry as an indexical activity that involves the crafted object and the researcher in an ethico-political process of co-constituting knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalHuman Relations
Volume73
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1366-1387
Number of pages22
ISSN0018-7267
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 512 Business and Management
  • craft
  • ethics
  • knowledge
  • methodology
  • reflexivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics, politics and embodied imagination in crafting scientific knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this