TY - JOUR
T1 - From business models for public actors to public service provision models
T2 - Extending the business model concept to the public sector
AU - Lorenz, Selina
AU - Heigl, Barbara
AU - Palmié, Maximilian
AU - Oghazi, Pejvak
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge funding by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project number 407740_187381 ), the European Union (project number 101096571 ), and the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (project number 23.00121 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Every organization, knowingly or unknowingly, operates a business model. However, while private actors frequently make use of the business model concept to actively manage their service provision, public organizations struggle with adopting it. This has led to a separate literature stream in which public management scholars developed public sector adaptations of the business model concept. As the business model conceptualizations in the general and public management literatures diverge, insight transfer between both streams is becoming increasingly difficult. Building on the need for more conceptual alignment in business model research, this article explores how the divergent conceptualizations of business models in the general and public management literatures can be reintegrated. It first presents the results of a focused literature review to illustrate their commonalities and differences. The article then introduces an integrated business model framework for the private and public sectors to merge the findings of both streams as well as to provide a common language for public-private business model realization. By advocating an integrated approach, we aim to bridge the emerging gap between the general and public management business model literatures, thereby seeking to counteract the gap's adverse implications for business model research as well as practice.
AB - Every organization, knowingly or unknowingly, operates a business model. However, while private actors frequently make use of the business model concept to actively manage their service provision, public organizations struggle with adopting it. This has led to a separate literature stream in which public management scholars developed public sector adaptations of the business model concept. As the business model conceptualizations in the general and public management literatures diverge, insight transfer between both streams is becoming increasingly difficult. Building on the need for more conceptual alignment in business model research, this article explores how the divergent conceptualizations of business models in the general and public management literatures can be reintegrated. It first presents the results of a focused literature review to illustrate their commonalities and differences. The article then introduces an integrated business model framework for the private and public sectors to merge the findings of both streams as well as to provide a common language for public-private business model realization. By advocating an integrated approach, we aim to bridge the emerging gap between the general and public management business model literatures, thereby seeking to counteract the gap's adverse implications for business model research as well as practice.
KW - 512 Business and Management
KW - Business models
KW - Private sector
KW - Public sector
KW - Public service provision models
KW - Public-private collaboration
KW - Smart city
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185529730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123273
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123273
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85185529730
SN - 0040-1625
VL - 201
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
M1 - 123273
ER -