Frugal innovation hijacked: The co-optive power of co-creation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we investigate how different discourses on frugal innovation are articulated, and how the dynamics between these different discourses have led to a certain dominant understanding of frugal innovation today. We analyse the dynamic interactions between three discourses on frugal innovation: (1) innovations for the poor, (2) grassroots innovations by the poor, and more recently (3) co-creating frugal innovations with the poor. We argue that this latter discourse is articulated as a hegemonic project as it is designed to accommodate demands from both business and poor communities. We draw on Laclau and Mouffe’s concepts of ‘chain of difference’, ‘empty signifier’ and ‘floating signifier’ to explain the advent of the hegemonic discourse on co-creating innovations with the poor. We show how a floating signifier with radical potential, frugal innovation, has been hijacked and co-opted in a hegemonic project that has leveraged powerful ambiguous signifiers, with co-creation acting as an empty signifier. To clarify what is problematic in this hegemonic intervention, we expose how contemporary frugal innovation discourse contributes to a project of governing and exploiting rather than helping the poor, in ways that benefit formal economic actors while further worsening global inequalities.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalJournal of Business Ethics
ISSN0167-4544
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Sustainable Development Goals

  • GOAL 06: Clean Water and Sanitation
  • GOAL 09: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
  • GOAL 17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal

Areas of Strength and Areas of High Potential (AoS and AoHP)

  • AoS: Responsible organising

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Frugal innovation hijacked: The co-optive power of co-creation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this