Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives’ Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology

Nina Granqvist, Stine Grodal, Jennifer Woolley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Executives use market labels to position their firms within market categories. Yet this activity has been given scarce attention in the extant literature that widely assumes that market labels are simple, prescribed classification brackets that accurately represent firms' characteristics. By examining how and why executives use the nanotechnology label, we uncover three strategies: claiming, disassociating, and hedging. Comparing these strategies to firms' technological capabilities, we find that capabilities alone do not explain executives' label use. Instead, the data show that these strategies are driven by executives' aspiration to symbolically influence their firms' market categorization. In particular, executives' perception of the label's ambiguity, their avoidance of perceived credibility gaps, and their assessment of the label's signaling value shape their labeling strategies. In contrast to extant research, which suggests that executives should aim for coherence, we find that many executives hedge their affiliation with a nascent market label. Thus, our study shows that in ambiguous contexts, noncommitment to a market category may be a particularly prevalent strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalOrganization Science
Volume24
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)395-413
ISSN1047-7039
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19.03.2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • Equis Base Room

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives’ Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this