Abstract
This article analyses the intertwining inequalities in wage determination and the gender-neutral legitimacy that pay systems provide by masking these inequalities. Job evaluation and performance-related pay were originally designed for purposes other than promoting equal pay, namely as managerial tools for determining wage levels. Typically, the main objective of a pay system is not to promote equal pay. Still, as a tool for assessing the value of work, job evaluation is regarded as a central method in promoting equal pay. The use of job evaluation is recommended by the European Commission and the International Labour Organization, and often features in gender-equality policy and legislation. In contrast with the status of job evaluation, little research exists on performance-related pay and gender pay equity. The findings show that the wages determined by pay systems reflect gendered cultural valuations of jobs and occupations. Pay systems provide gender-neutral legitimacy for gender-based wage disparities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Gender, Work & Organization |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 156-170 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISSN | 0968-6673 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10.10.2016 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- equal pay
- job evaluation
- performance-related pay
- gender-neutral legitimacy
- intertwining inequalities