Is Long-Run Risk Really Priced? Revisiting Liu and Matthies (2022)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The claim by Liu and Matthies (LM) that their macro news risk factor (NI) prices 51 portfolios (associated with four different portfolio groups) is not appropriate. In fact, their single-factor model is successful only in explaining the momentum deciles, while producing strongly negative performance for the remaining groups. The pricing performance is more doubtful in the case of the alternative news factor (HNI), as the respective risk price is not identified. LM's conclusions stem from a combination of questionable empirical choices and misinterpretation of their results. Moreover, the NI model cannot explain prominent capital asset pricing model anomalies not considered in their study.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalJournal of Finance
Volume79
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)2885-2900
Number of pages16
ISSN0022-1082
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22.04.2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 512 Business and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Long-Run Risk Really Priced? Revisiting Liu and Matthies (2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this