Abstract
Deposit insurance designs in many countries place a limit on the coverage of deposits in each bank. However, no limits are placed on the number of accounts held with different banks. Therefore, under limited deposit insurance, some consumers open accounts with different banks to achieve higher or full deposit insurance coverage. We compare three regimes of deposit insurance: no deposit insurance, unlimited deposit insurance, and limited deposit insurance. We show that limited deposit insurance weakens competition among banks and reduces total welfare relative to no or unlimited deposit insurance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Banking & Finance |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | October |
Pages (from-to) | 95-108 |
Number of pages | 14 |
ISSN | 0378-4266 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 511 Economics
- Limited deposit insurance coverage
- Deposit rates
- Bank competition
- Bailout cost