Abstract
The paper studies theoretically how the optimal contract in the hidden-action moral-hazard model is affected when an agent feels bad when not reaching a target effort set in the contract. In equilibrium, the agent's effort falls short of the target, inducing guilt, which must be compensated by a higher financial reward. Thus, although the principal's payoff is higher, the agent receives a part of the monetary rents accruing to intrinsic motivation. This result differs markedly from previous contributions on contracting under social preference or pro-social motivation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics |
Volume | 167 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 224-235 |
Number of pages | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 511 Economics
- KOTA2011