Abstract
This paper investigates tensions both within and between slow-the-loop (StL) or close-the-loop (CtL) strategies in the early stages of a circular ecosystem. The study applies an embedded case design and investigates the e-bike ecosystem in Finland. We interviewed the main actors of this ecosystem and performed a qualitative data analysis. First, we identified tensions within both StL and CtL strategies. We aggregated tensions into three categories: e-bike design, operation logic, and e-bike users. Second, we propose that alternative circular strategies can become oppositional poles in the early the stages of ecosystem. Based on paradox literature and a polarity map, we discuss how the emerging ecosystem needs to shift from either/or to both/and thinking to develop circular strategies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of IPSERA 2024 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication date | 24.03.2024 |
Publication status | Published - 24.03.2024 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in conference proceedings |
Event | 33rd IPSERA Conference - Rio De Janeiro, Brazil Duration: 24.03.2024 → 27.04.2024 Conference number: 33 https://ipsera2024.com/ |
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- Ciruclar supply chains
- paradox theory
- e-bikes
- ciruclar design
Areas of Strength and Areas of High Potential (AoS and AoHP)
- AoHP: Humanitarian and societal logistics