Recursive utility under the ICAPM: Is it relevant?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

I show that, under the benchmark homoskedastic framework in Campbell (1993) (C93), the assumption of recursive utility is unnecessary to derive the ICAPM pricing equation. That is, by assuming the standard power utility one obtains the same exact pricing equation. This also holds when deriving the (heteroskedastic) three-factor ICAPM of Campbell, Giglio, Polk, and Turley (2018). The assumption of recursive utility in C93 is no longer innocuous under heteroskedasticity. However, the respective ICAPM is not empirically testable unless one is willing to impose ad-hoc restrictions. Overall, recursive utility is largely irrelevant to obtaining Campbell's ICAPM and its various extensions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112724
Peer-reviewed scientific journalEconomics Letters
Volume258
ISSN0165-1765
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.2026
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 512 Business and Management
  • Asset pricing
  • Consumption CAPM
  • ICAPM
  • Power utility
  • Recursive utility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recursive utility under the ICAPM: Is it relevant?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this