Abstract
The globalization of the securities markets and rapid technological advancement
have made international financial markets law an increasingly important area of
regulation, practice, and scholarly research. Yet more indepth analysis of the
differences of financial markets law and securities law, in particular, remains
unexplored to explicate for underlying reasons for divergence. This study contributes to the stream of literature comparing securities law in the EU and the U.S. The fin dings suggest that differences in securities law arise from differing investor bases and different levels of integration of capital markets. Prohibition on trading on inside information in the EU is more recent but more extensive whereas the U.S. approach is older and more limited in scope.
have made international financial markets law an increasingly important area of
regulation, practice, and scholarly research. Yet more indepth analysis of the
differences of financial markets law and securities law, in particular, remains
unexplored to explicate for underlying reasons for divergence. This study contributes to the stream of literature comparing securities law in the EU and the U.S. The fin dings suggest that differences in securities law arise from differing investor bases and different levels of integration of capital markets. Prohibition on trading on inside information in the EU is more recent but more extensive whereas the U.S. approach is older and more limited in scope.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Europarättslig tidskrift |
Volume | 2021 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 437-454 |
ISSN | 1403-8722 |
Publication status | Published - 03.09.2021 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 513 Law