The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges

Leigh Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015–2018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor & Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.

Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalQuantitative Science Studies
Volume4
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)778-799
Number of pages22
ISSN2641-3337
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 518 Media and communications
  • academic publishing market
  • article processing charges
  • big five academic publishers
  • open access
  • Unpaywall
  • Web of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this