Use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

Erin C. McKiernan*, Lesley A. Schimanski, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lisa Matthias, Meredith T. Niles, Juan P. Alperin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed how often and in what ways the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is currently used in review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) documents of a representative sample of universities from the United States and Canada. 40% of research-intensive institutions and 18% of master’s institutions mentioned the JIF, or closely related terms. Of the institutions that mentioned the JIF, 87% supported its use in at least one of their RPT documents, 13% expressed caution about its use, and none heavily criticized it or prohibited its use. Furthermore, 63% of institutions that mentioned the JIF associated the metric with quality, 40% with impact, importance, or significance, and 20% with prestige, reputation, or status. We conclude that use of the JIF is encouraged in RPT evaluations, especially at research-intensive universities, and that there is work to be done to avoid the potential misuse of metrics like the JIF.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere47338
Peer-reviewed scientific journaleLife
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 07.2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Cite this