What determines stock option contract design?

Eva Liljeblom, Daniel Pasternack, Matts Rosenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyze the factors that drive exercise price policy for executive option plans (ESOPs) and their scope in a country where firms are not subject to the tax and accounting considerations that seem to have led to the dominance of at-the-money options in the US Our “unbounded” data for Finland provide us with an excellent opportunity to investigate whether contract design is consistent with compensation theory. Our findings are largely consistent with predictions from the optimal contracting literature. The size of the plan is negatively related to Tobin's Q and firm size and positively related to proxies for monitoring costs, which also influence the probability of launching premium ESOPs. Our results also show that the premium (out-of-the-moneyness) is negatively related to prior stock returns and cash flow-to-assets, which may be an indication of high-water mark contracting, or alternatively, of managerial power. Finally, we also find some support for a positive relation between the premium and the length of the vesting period when maturity is fixed, which indicates an effort to keep the incentives for management from falling over time.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalJournal of Financial Economics
Volume102
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)293-316
Number of pages24
ISSN0304-405X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

  • 511 Economics
  • Stock option contract design
  • Optimal contracting
  • Agency cost
  • KOTA2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What determines stock option contract design?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this