Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman

Héloïse Berkowitz, Sanne Bor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)


In a recent issue in this journal, Lawton et al. and Spillman argue for the importance of studying trade associations, also referred to with the broader term meta-organization. They discuss why meta-organizations matter and why more research is needed on the topic. We fully concur with the authors that meta-organizations constitute an inflating, diverse, and undeniable phenomenon of collective action among organizations and that collective scholarly efforts are necessary to improve our understanding of meta-organizations in their multiplicity. In this article, we shed some light on a body of work already investigating the matter. They constitute what we call the “European School” of meta-organization. We show the relevance of this recent European work for the US–UK-oriented trade association research and aim to bridge the gap between these research traditions by proposing a common research agenda on key topics of resources, forms’ differentiation, coopetition, and their role in sustainability governance.
Original languageEnglish
Peer-reviewed scientific journalJournal of Management Inquiry
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)204– 211
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article - refereed


  • 512 Business and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this