Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences

Tamanna Adhikari; Michael Breen; Robert Gillanders

doi:10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500

Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences

Tamanna Adhikari, Michael Breen^*, Robert Gillanders

^*Motsvarande författare för detta arbete

Nationalekonomi, Helsingfors

Forskningsoutput: Tidskriftsbidrag › Artikel › Vetenskaplig › Peer review

2 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

We find that new states are perceived to be more corrupt even though businesses do not report more bribery in newer states. This is suggestive of an unearned, and likely high, reputational cost to being a new state. These findings hold over a number of specifications that include additional economic, historical and geographic controls.

Originalspråk	Engelska
Referentgranskad vetenskaplig tidskrift	Applied Economics Letters
Volym	26
Nummer	2
Sidor (från-till)	131-134
Antal sidor	4
ISSN	1350-4851
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500
Status	Publicerad - 22.02.2018
MoE-publikationstyp	A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Nyckelord

511 Nationalekonomi

FN:s SDG:er

Detta resultat bidrar till följande hållbara utvecklingsmål:

Åtkomst av dokument

10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500

OpenUrl-tillgänglighet

Fulltext

Andra filer och länkar

Link to publication in Scopus

Citera det här

@article{0f6ea5aaab4f4e68a345419c381fdd5e,

title = "Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms{\textquoteright} experiences",

abstract = "We find that new states are perceived to be more corrupt even though businesses do not report more bribery in newer states. This is suggestive of an unearned, and likely high, reputational cost to being a new state. These findings hold over a number of specifications that include additional economic, historical and geographic controls.",

keywords = "511 Economics, Corruption, corruption perceptions, bribery, state age",

author = "Tamanna Adhikari and Michael Breen and Robert Gillanders",

year = "2018",

month = feb,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "131--134 ",

journal = "Applied Economics Letters",

issn = "1350-4851",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences

AU - Adhikari, Tamanna

AU - Breen, Michael

AU - Gillanders, Robert

PY - 2018/2/22

Y1 - 2018/2/22

N2 - We find that new states are perceived to be more corrupt even though businesses do not report more bribery in newer states. This is suggestive of an unearned, and likely high, reputational cost to being a new state. These findings hold over a number of specifications that include additional economic, historical and geographic controls.

AB - We find that new states are perceived to be more corrupt even though businesses do not report more bribery in newer states. This is suggestive of an unearned, and likely high, reputational cost to being a new state. These findings hold over a number of specifications that include additional economic, historical and geographic controls.

KW - 511 Economics

KW - Corruption

KW - corruption perceptions

KW - bribery

KW - state age

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042446713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500

DO - 10.1080/13504851.2018.1441500

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042446713

SN - 1350-4851

VL - 26

SP - 131

EP - 134

JO - Applied Economics Letters

JF - Applied Economics Letters

IS - 2

ER -

Are new states more corrupt? Expert opinions versus firms’ experiences

Sammanfattning

Nyckelord

FN:s SDG:er

Åtkomst av dokument

OpenUrl-tillgänglighet

Andra filer och länkar

Fingeravtryck

Citera det här