TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon pricing versus emissions trading
T2 - A supply chain planning perspective
AU - Zakeri, Atefe
AU - Dehghanian, Farzad
AU - Fahimnia, Behnam
AU - Sarkis, Joseph
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Carbon pricing (taxes) and carbon emissions trading are two globally practiced carbon regulatory policy schemes. This paper presents an analytical supply chain planning model that can be used to examine the supply chain performance at the tactical/operational planning level under these two policy schemes. Model implementation and analyses are completed using actual data from a company operating in Australia, where these environmental regulatory policies are practiced. Numerical results provide important managerial and practical implications and policy insights. In particular, the results show that there are inflection points where both carbon pricing and trading schemes could influence costs or emissions reductions. An erratic nonlinear emissions reduction trend is observed in a carbon pricing scheme as the carbon price increases steadily; whereas emissions reduction in a carbon trading scheme follows a relatively linear trend with a nonlinear cost increase. Overall, a carbon trading mechanism, although imperfect, appears to result in better supply chain performance in terms of emissions generation, cost, and service level; even though a carbon tax may be more worthwhile from an uncertainty perspective as emissions trading costs depend on numerous uncertain market conditions.
AB - Carbon pricing (taxes) and carbon emissions trading are two globally practiced carbon regulatory policy schemes. This paper presents an analytical supply chain planning model that can be used to examine the supply chain performance at the tactical/operational planning level under these two policy schemes. Model implementation and analyses are completed using actual data from a company operating in Australia, where these environmental regulatory policies are practiced. Numerical results provide important managerial and practical implications and policy insights. In particular, the results show that there are inflection points where both carbon pricing and trading schemes could influence costs or emissions reductions. An erratic nonlinear emissions reduction trend is observed in a carbon pricing scheme as the carbon price increases steadily; whereas emissions reduction in a carbon trading scheme follows a relatively linear trend with a nonlinear cost increase. Overall, a carbon trading mechanism, although imperfect, appears to result in better supply chain performance in terms of emissions generation, cost, and service level; even though a carbon tax may be more worthwhile from an uncertainty perspective as emissions trading costs depend on numerous uncertain market conditions.
KW - 512 Business and Management
KW - Supply chain planning
KW - Carbon pricing
KW - Carbon tax
KW - Carbon trading
KW - Cap-and-trade
KW - Case study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927959803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84927959803
VL - 164
SP - 197
EP - 205
JO - International Journal of Production Economics
JF - International Journal of Production Economics
SN - 0925-5273
IS - June
ER -