CSR Performance and the Readability of CSR Reports: Too Good to be True?

Zhihong Wang*, Tien Shih Hsieh, Joseph Sarkis

*Motsvarande författare för detta arbete

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

113 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

Using a manually collected sample of 331 corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports issued by US public companies, we examine the relationship between the CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports. We adopt three indices – Fog, Kincaid, and Flesch – to measure the readability of CSR reports and draw upon two databases – ESG and KLD – to measure CSR performance from both environmental and social perspectives. The results show a significant positive relationship between CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports, indicating that companies with stronger CSR performance are more likely to have CSR reports with higher readability. Further, the association of the readability of CSR reports with social performance is stronger than with environmental performance. This study helps investors more comprehensively evaluate the CSR information disclosed on CSR reports. Our results also point to the importance of regulating the narrative disclosure of CSR information, especially social performance.

OriginalspråkEngelska
Referentgranskad vetenskaplig tidskriftCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volym25
Utgåva1
Sidor (från-till)66-79
Antal sidor14
ISSN1535-3958
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 04.07.2017
MoE-publikationstypA1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Nyckelord

  • 512 Företagsekonomi

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”CSR Performance and the Readability of CSR Reports: Too Good to be True?”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här