Quantitative Easing Forever? Financialisation and the Institutional Legitimacy of the Federal Reserve’s Unconventional Monetary Policy

Antti Ronkainen, Ville-Pekka Sorsa

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

6 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

Scholars of financialisation have argued that the emergence of finance-led grow regimes requires new instruments for effective conduct of economic policy. In this scholarship, central banks have been seen as the most promising actors to utilise one of the most synergetic policies, the maintenance of high and stable prices of financial assets. Since the financial crisis of 2007-08, central banks of the developed world have adopted various unconventional monetary policy measures that serve this function. But will these unconventional measures become institutionally legitimate and institutionalised as conventional practice, as suggested necessary by scholars of financialisation? In this paper, we answer to this question by studying the institutional legitimation of the Federal Reserve’s Quantiative Easing (QE) programs. We argue that the QE programs have been legitimated successfully but with institutional legitimation strategies, which cause institutional pressures that question the potential of QE from becoming a regular policy instrument and practice.
OriginalspråkEngelska
Referentgranskad vetenskaplig tidskriftNew Political Economy
Volym23
Utgåva6
Sidor (från-till)711-727
ISSN1356-3467
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 18.09.2018
MoE-publikationstypA1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Nyckelord

  • 517 Statsvetenskap
  • 512 Företagsekonomi

Fingeravtryck Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”Quantitative Easing Forever? Financialisation and the Institutional Legitimacy of the Federal Reserve’s Unconventional Monetary Policy”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

  • Citera det här