State Ownership and Corruption

Steve Billon, Robert Gillanders

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

15 Citeringar (Scopus)


We test two interesting results that can be obtained from a simplified version of the theoretical model of Shleifer and Vishny (Q J Econ 109(4):995–1025, 1994) that studies bargaining between politicians and managers of state-owned firms. The model suggests that firms with more state ownership tend to pay less in bribes but not have a different experience of costly obstacles imposed on them by politicians. In our full sample, the results suggest that a one percentage increase in state ownership is associated with a $125 reduction in the total annual informal payment of the firm and with a 0.5 % decrease in the probability that a firm will consider corruption to be an obstacle to their current operations. We refine these average relationships by splitting the sample by global region. Only in our Europe and Central Asia sample do we find strong evidence in support of the first result and again we find a significant effect of state ownership on obstacles.
Referentgranskad vetenskaplig tidskriftInternational Tax and Public Finance
Sidor (från-till)1074–1092
Antal sidor19
StatusPublicerad - 2016
MoE-publikationstypA1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift


  • 511 Nationalekonomi


Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”State Ownership and Corruption”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här