TY - JOUR
T1 - The oligopoly’s shift to open access
T2 - How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges
AU - Butler, Leigh Ann
AU - Matthias, Lisa
AU - Simard, Marc André
AU - Mongeon, Philippe
AU - Haustein, Stefanie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, and Stefanie Haustein.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015–2018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor & Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.
AB - We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015–2018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor & Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.
KW - 518 Media and communications
KW - academic publishing market
KW - article processing charges
KW - big five academic publishers
KW - open access
KW - Unpaywall
KW - Web of Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184226858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/qss_a_00272
DO - 10.1162/qss_a_00272
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184226858
SN - 2641-3337
VL - 4
SP - 778
EP - 799
JO - Quantitative Science Studies
JF - Quantitative Science Studies
IS - 4
ER -